Jordan is the Arab-Palestinian State which is on Jewish land - YJ Draiman

Jordan is the Arab-Palestinian State which is on Jewish land.

Legally Israel could under International Law it can take-over Jordan. The British violated International Law when they parceled off over three quarters of Jewish land to the Arabs. Israel has to notify the Arabs who reside west of the Jordan River, and that they the Arabs are there because Israel’s generosity and they have no right to complain. Hebron is the second holiest city in Judaism after Jerusalem. Mecca) and Medina (Medina was a Jewish city named Yathrib) is the holy city for the Arabs which are in Arabia aka Saudi Arabia. Hebron is the holy city to the Jews going back to the days of Abraham which is located in Judea which the Jewish people derive their name.

The UN resolutions are non-binding and have no legal standing the UN has no authority to assign territory or modify international treaties like the April 1920 San Remo Conference that incorporated the Balfour Declaration (without boundary restrictions) as international law and Jewish sovereignty must be applied, you do not need to annexed your own liberated territory. At the Same time they allocated over 6 million sq. km. of territory to the Arabs with a wealth of oil reserves including Jordan as the new Arab state on Jewish land, which is the Arab-Palestinian state. The Oslo Accords are null and void as stated by Abbas at the U.N. Any peace agreement must be approved by the people of Israel. The Oslo Accords are null and void as states by Abbas numerous times. It is time to reverse all concessions and set back the status quo of 1992, no Arab PA with Israel in total control of Judea and Samaria and all the territories west of the Jordan River.

YJ Draiman

P.S. Jordan and the Arab countries will have to cooperate. It will be in their best economic interest. Part of the relocation process of the Arabs is funding for the relocation including housing and industry. There is billions of dollars allocated for such transfer. After WWII over 100 million people were resettled. Any Arab who wants to stay under Israel's sovereignty must abide by the laws of Israel and any action whatsoever will result of the immediate expulsion. It is better than spending billions on defense and for the Arabs utilizing their funding for building an economy instead of funding terror and violence.

YJ Draiman

Israel should stop giving money to the Arab-Palestinians as long as they pay the terrorists and their families and also as long as they commit and promote terror and violence no funds will be forthcoming.

The British Mandate for Palestine terminated over seventy years ago. However, this basic document—first set forth and agreed upon by the Principal Allied Powers in April 1920 at The San Remo Conference (which allocated over 6 million square miles of territory with a wealth of oil reserves for the Arabs) and partially in The LON Mandate for Palestine in 1922—re-established the modern-day legal status of Judea and Samaria, and remains crucial. In fact, the purpose of the Mandate has been fully executed and realized. Israel has become a Jewish homeland, civil and religious rights of the non-Jewish minority are protected, and access to the holy places in Jerusalem is guaranteed to all religions.

The Mandate for Palestine, a binding international treaty "in fact and in law," 115 designated Palestine without boundary restrictions as the allocated national home of the Jewish people, and recognized the territory of "Palestine" as including the area of Judea and Samaria and the areas of what is formerly known as Palestine. No valid treaty, document, or resolution altered this reality. UN non-binding Resolution 181 which is non-binding with no legal standing, which proposed a Partition of the territory, was never came to fruition and nullified and voided by Arab aggression and refusal to accept the existence of a Jewish state in Palestine. Thus, upon termination of the Mandate in 1948, the Jewish people received sovereignty—the res of the Mandate-trust—over this territory .with no boundary restrictions. No subsequent agreement or resolution repudiated Israeli sovereignty over the area defined by the April 1920 San Remo Conference and its application of the Mandate for Palestine by the LON, which continues to dictate the existence of Israeli sovereignty over Judea and Samaria and other parts of Palestine aka The Land of Israel.

45 The League of Nations originally created Mandatory Palestine on both banks of the Jordan River based on the Treaty agreed to at the April 1920 San Remo Conference. However, on September 16, 1922 in accordance with the Transjordan Memorandum, the League of Nations amended the original Mandate for Palestine to include Article 25. Specifically, Article 25 authorized Great Britain to "postpone or withhold" Jewish close settlement in the area of the Mandate east of the Jordan River." Although the legality of the act is in possible violation of the April 1920 San Remo Conference Agreements. Britain indeed exercised the alleged right and illegally partitioned the area east of the Jordan River, creating the "territory known as Trans-Jordan" in 1922. As explained above, the Mandatory exempted the application of the Balfour articles (Articles 2, 4, 6, 13, 14, 22, and 23), as well as abbreviating the application of others (Articles 7 and 11) designed to achieve "the establishment of the Jewish national home." See Crawford, The Creation of States in International Law, 428-9. However, it should be noted that no limitation was placed on the other articles, specifically Article 5, which encourages Jewish settlement in Judea and Samaria. This right has never been abdicated and remains consistent with international customary law regarding the concept of “usufruct” embodied in Article 55 of the Hague Regulations (1899 and 1907) even to the extent that Israel could – inaccurately- be viewed as an “occupier”. (While beyond the scope of this report, it can be argued that this same concept would invalidate any land transfers by Jordan during its illegal occupation, and could, at best, have had validity only until Jordan’s withdrawal. The laws of usufruct do not permit the permanent transfer of government land and any such attempts can be seen as void. The validity of such transfers are dubious at best and each case would have to scrutinized in light of land law requirements.)

Jewish heroism From that remote day 4,500 years ago, when Abraham successfully led his band of “trained young men” against the federated city kings to the rescue of his brother Lot, the city of Salem; the roll of commanders of fighting men is a long and heroic one—Joshua, Gideon, Jephtha, David, Joab, Abner, the Maccabees, Ben Yair, the defender of Masada, whom archaeology has restored to history only recently (after 2,000 years) to name but a few of them—and on down to Generals [Moshe] Dayan and [Chaim] PM Rabin in our own generation.